If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I expected the new sensor to be more accurate given it's ?30 just for the sensor chip (capacitive type) and it factors in temp so you get Relative Humidity. But yeh, didn't expect the one in the humidifier to be so far out - might take it apart to see what chip it uses.
Gotta love male logic! Must find out what makes it work!!!!! My father is the same he can generally strip down and rebuild something and there will only be two or three screws leftover! ....'Spares'
That's quite a big difference, I tested three digital meters this morning and there was a difference of 1% between each so 2% between the highest and lowest.
I expected the new sensor to be more accurate given it's ?30 just for the sensor chip (capacitive type) and it factors in temp so you get Relative Humidity. But yeh, didn't expect the one in the humidifier to be so far out - might take it apart to see what chip it uses.
That's quite a big difference, I tested three digital meters this morning and there was a difference of 1% between each so 2% between the highest and lowest.
Getting an accurate relative humidity reading isn't easy and the sensors aren't cheap. Given the cost of the cigar oasis xl I was hoping it would be reasonably close - but after using it over the last few years i've had to increase it's setting to stop the cigars from feeling dry.
I bought a Sensirion SHT75 sensor which is factory calibrated and accurate to +/- 1.8% RH and it's been in the humidor for a few weeks now so it's had time to settle.
There is a variation of ~9% between the two, which whilst not surprising, I'd hoped for a difference of around 4-5%
Some great info in there sarge lol I am using silica cat litter (I have also seen plenty use the cat litter with blue markings, but some say that may be scent, others say it is not...Bob Martin does some of the colourless stuff which I use just to be on the safe side.
and some deionised water from halfords or whatever and you're set for life.
Even with the digital ones, i am quite confident the accuracy is not exact, these aren't lab grade pieces of equipment, but as pretty much everyone uses more or less the same stuff/methods, as others have said, being overly obsessive/precise is probably a waste of time.
I too am not obsessive about the range but I don't like it going above 70 (think a lot of complaints about tight draws on Havanas come down to this, I think thats why some people seem to suffer from this more than others. If it's plugged that's something else but something that's a bit over filled can be smokable on the drier side but bring the humidity up & it closes off). I have had probelms with tight draws at 70+ & split feet at 74. 64-68 ideal for me but a couple under or over will happen throughout the yr & through frequent use periods ect.
I wouldn't trust that hygrometer as it could be 20% out easily. Look into a good digital dial and something like Heartfelt beads as media.
I did wonder whether it was a bit cheap and unreliable. I'll move it first and see how it fares. If the problem persists then I may have to look into some upgrades
Leave a comment: