If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Tapes are out and CD's are now in Hampshire. We're working towards digital files for court etc so this is the way to go.
Anyway tapes break and are so 1980's that most new police recruits say "what are these?" makes me feel old.
The main reason it has taken this long is that we bought all the tapes we could when they stopped mass producing them, so a warehouse full of tapes was not going to just get binned.
Anyway Polaroids were rubbish pics, digital camera evidence has been so much better for the interviewer and for court.
Or clonked on the noggin with some old tech.... 4D Maglite.
Christ I feel old now, Maglites are new tech to me, I still think of torches as the old school big ass battery weigh a ton one bulb last five minutes type
Why do the fuzz still use tapes? Is it supposed to be a chain of evidence thing?
Because if someone fucks with the tape the cut can be detected easily. I could never understand why they moved from Polaroid to digital evidence cameras though. A Polaroid is almost tamper proof once its taken.
but on top of this, i think tapes would be better in the long run. it'd be controlled easily because making duplicates can be tracked better than digital copies. someone can't just break into a police vault and leave with 200 000 recordings if they use tapes. but i can do that if they had digital copies.
personally, i'd rather have my information on tapes than on media formats...
Leave a comment: