What makes a good and readable review?

[Deano]

There's kind of a template used already, see: http://www.ukcigarforums.com/showthread.php?t=4921

My review is very short though, so try to give a bit more detail - I'm rubbish at it!

[r0lan6]

To me a really good reviewer would be someone who can make you feel like you are literally smoking the cigar being reviewed! It needs to be broken down into tried and tested sub-categories to assist in its overall validity. Most importantly we need the review to be reliable, which means that it would be essential to have more than one review for the same cigar. A fantastic example is C-Gars Ltd's review process! Just take a look at the reviews for the Magnum 46!

http://www.cgarsltd.co.uk/upmann-magnum-cigars-p-126.html

After all we can't just take one person's opinion can we...?

[Robert747]

I read the Romeo No.1. review from mattday - it is the first review he has written and I thought it was great. I have been smoking hand made cigars for over 25 years but have never written a full review (just comments and observations).

So just what does make a good review? mattday had his own points scoring system - some reviews test my short attention span - Does anyone have a template I could use to write a review.