Originally posted by PeeJay
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Chat Box Possibility?
Collapse
X
-
-
John. Haven't heard much from your side on not wanting a collective, no-cap, chat box...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Wigan View PostNow I have had a think about it I have changed my mind.
If its the same as the old system you mentioned and restricted to 2 or 3 people per chat then it kinda goes against what this place seems to be all about. You would lose out on the collective wisdom that stops somebody sprouting nonsense as though it was gospel truth or at least lets you shoot it down. Even people who aren't like that make the occasional mistake and it being an open forum that everyone can see (and at a later date then when it was said) means it can be corrected. It being assorted by threads means there is an archive of this knowable for future botl to make use of (and maybe current ones to use to refresh there memory).
I know this was suggest to be used for just having a chat but lets be honest, its going to be about cigars isn't it, and therefore could very well be helpful to others if kept and stored as we are now.
Leave a comment:
-
Now I have had a think about it I have changed my mind.
If its the same as the old system you mentioned and restricted to 2 or 3 people per chat then it kinda goes against what this place seems to be all about. You would lose out on the collective wisdom that stops somebody sprouting nonsense as though it was gospel truth or at least lets you shoot it down. Even people who aren't like that make the occasional mistake and it being an open forum that everyone can see (and at a later date then when it was said) means it can be corrected. It being assorted by threads means there is an archive of this knowable for future botl to make use of (and maybe current ones to use to refresh there memory).
I know this was suggest to be used for just having a chat but lets be honest, its going to be about cigars isn't it, and therefore could very well be helpful to others if kept and stored as we are now.
Leave a comment:
-
Chit and/or Chat!
Originally posted by cj121 View PostWTF was the topic!
Back on topic, there was Comet Chat which lived at the bottom of the page. It was more discreet in its presence and not open to anyone apart from the two participants. That might be the way forward.
Here's the problem - if you can see them on-line, they can see you on-line and will likely want to start "chatting" just because. I found it difficult to post and chat at the same time, but if you ignored a "chat request" because you were busy reading and/or posting, you were viewed as a "chat snob."
Quite the conundrum, don't you know.
Jay, Ray Jay
Leave a comment:
-
To avoid abuse perhaps have it linked to pm. i.e. only available to members who pm privileges?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by cj121 View PostWTF was the topic!
Back on topic, there was Comet Chat which lived at the bottom of the page. It was more discreet in its presence and not open to anyone apart from the two participants. That might be the way forward.
Leave a comment:
-
WTF was the topic!
Back on topic, there was Comet Chat which lived at the bottom of the page. It was more discreet in its presence and not open to anyone apart from the two participants. That might be the way forward.
Leave a comment:
-
More to Come!
Originally posted by butternutsquashpie View Postwelcome back, BagBoy. You find a cure for that sudden influx of mongoloidism??
Boy, Bag Boy
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TJCoro View Post
Oh how seemingly ironic this post is...
Leave a comment:
-
Just do it!
Originally posted by cj121 View PostI often think we need one that reads "WTF was the topic"
Originally posted by butternutsquashpie View Postwell like mentioned... if you don't find any use, don't use it.
Boy, Bag Boy
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by PeeJay View PostWhat would be the benefit? Forum rules would apply, you can only use it when you're on so it wouldn't add anything at all. It wouldn't be private, that's what PMs are for and like Deano said, it would be open to abuse.
if it was just put there and there's no hassle to Deano, all should be well. I can imagine that the majority of us would remain civil on there. afterall, if grown men can't moderate themselves on such a hobby, what's the point of a forum anyways?
Leave a comment:
-
Bang A Gong!
Originally posted by PeeJay View PostIt wouldn't be private, that's what PMs are for and like Deano said, it would be open to abuse.
HAVE YOU?!?
Jay, Ray Jay
Leave a comment:
Powered by vBulletin® Version 5.7.5
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
All times are GMT. This page was generated at 07:20 AM.
Leave a comment: