Originally posted by ValeTudoGuy
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Boveda - A Word of Warning - To All
Collapse
X
-
My first question is why 84%? I didn't even know they made them above 70%. Secondly don't put any humi device in parcels when posting them the distance/time continuum makes this unnecessary & the draw backs came be costly. I had a parcel recently with a 68% pack in & it burst the feet of many sticks, which had been kept much lower.Simon Bolivar: Liberator of Bolivia, Ecuador, Peru & Venezuela.
Comment
-
84 is a seasoning package.Originally posted by Simon Bolivar View PostMy first question is why 84%? I didn't even know they made them above 70%.
I had a parcel recently with a 68% pack in & it burst the feet of many sticks, which had been kept much lower.
Boveda makes 1 over 70. They make:
62, 65, 69, 72
Sent from my Q10 using Tapatalk
Comment
-
....... I'm unaware of any 50-60 range Boveda packs. Are you sure they go down to 35!?Originally posted by Wigan View PostThey make em all the way down to 35 I think
Also, forgot to add that they go all the way up to 75%. I currently know they go from 62-75
Comment
-
Yes they are. They advertise to the cigar community and even have partnerships with people like C.Gars (our sponsors) to distribute bovedas. If they aren't meant for cigars, it's hard to imagine they would try so hard to reach our shores.Originally posted by Wigan View PostThey are not intended for tobacco use. They are for dried foods, rice and beans that sort of thing
A look on the website reveals that Boveda packs:
"Unlocks color, aroma, flavor, locks in THC"
Huh. They're more than just for food/cigars, apparently........ And they also used to have 54% stock. Huh.
Comment
-
I didn't mean the company in general fannyballs, just certain percent packs.
The 30 40 and 50 ones are not intended for cigars. They are for food and stuff.
The 65 69 70 etc are intended for cigars.
There is even one specific for cannabis storage, which of course you wouldn't be interested in............
Comment
-
Ah! Now we have a consensusOriginally posted by Wigan View PostThe 30 40 and 50 ones are not intended for cigars. They are for food and stuff.
The 65 69 70 etc are intended for cigars.
Yap. No interest here...Originally posted by Wigan View PostThere is even one specific for cannabis storage, which of course you wouldn't be interested in............
A recent posting on a Canadian forum that I frequent actually took light of this. He regrets taking cigars as a hobby as cannabis is ten times easier to choose as a hobby. It's much easier to maintain, grow, smoke, and cheaper too. Odd when you think about that, eh?
Comment
-
There was a huge case study into this some years ago in America. You may have heard of it, it was call prohibition.
It was eventually repealed not because it was decided that alcohol was suddenly ok for you. It was still believed to have all the same ills it was just that it was making bad men rich and powerful. Making something illegal doesn't stop it from happening it just pushes it underground. Don't smoke cannabis, tried in my youth same as 99% of the population, but I didn't like it. Made me feel funny and not in a good way. I am 100% in favour for taking a tax from it. My pint gets taxed to the hilt so why not get stoners to pay a tax too instead of letting bad people make money from it. Not that that makes all legitimate businessman are nice people, just there are not quite Al Capone...
Comment
-
Funny. Doctors used to perscribe morphine to alcohol addicts so they're addicted on a less destructive drug. Opium tea used correctly is one of the best rememdies before the British introduced smoking and the Germans figured out how to isolate the substance.Originally posted by Wigan View PostThere was a huge case study into this some years ago in America. You may have heard of it, it was call prohibition.
It was eventually repealed not because it was decided that alcohol was suddenly ok for you. It was still believed to have all the same ills it was just that it was making bad men rich and powerful.
Yuppo. It's also pretty difficult as I can turn 10 potatoes into a quart of vodka in my basement.Originally posted by Wigan View PostIt was still believed to have all the same ills it was just that it was making bad men rich and powerful. Making something illegal doesn't stop it from happening it just pushes it underground.
I only wish everyone knew this as you. Making things legal wouldn't cause mass pandamonium and a spike in drug use.Originally posted by Wigan View PostDon't smoke cannabis, tried in my youth same as 99% of the population, but I didn't like it. Made me feel funny and not in a good way.
Rather, it should decrease it and make everything safer...
Honestly... All things considered... Medical Marijuana legality and marijuana illegality is the best things for marijuana users. Right now, it's cheap and readily available to every high school student on the market.Originally posted by Wigan View PostI am 100% in favour for taking a tax from it. My pint gets taxed to the hilt so why not get stoners to pay a tax too instead of letting bad people make money from it. Not that that makes all legitimate businessman are nice people, just there are not quite Al Capone...
Funny how that is, eh?
Comment
-
I did read about LSD being used to treat alcoholics. One dose with a counsellor was all it took. Then it became popular on black market and it fell out of favour in medical circles but that's a discussion for another time I think that's enough drift for one thread lol
Comment
-
Fuck yeah, JIZZ!
Seriously, I think it unlikely that they will fail in my HUMIDORS as I hardly ever move stuff around. I no longer send them in the POST as I feel it is overkill to do so if the sticks are sealed up. I stand by Boveda as the easiest most trouble free device available. It is good to know their limits though so thanks for the thread.
Comment
Powered by vBulletin® Version 5.7.5
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
All times are GMT. This page was generated at 11:45 PM.






Comment