escort ordu kıbrıs escort escort izmit escort bodrum escort rize escort konya escort kırklareli escort van halkalı escort escort erzurum escort sivas escort samsun escort tokat altinrehbereskisehir.com konyachad.com sakaryaehliyet.com tiktaktrabzon.com escortlarkibris.net canakkalesondaj.com kayseriyelek.com buderuskonya.com Romeo y Julieta Wide Churchill - UK Cigar Forums

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Romeo y Julieta Wide Churchill

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Romeo y Julieta Wide Churchill

    Okay then guys. My latest offering is a review of the Wide Churchill from RyJ. It's a cigar which seems to have been quite a marmite release from Habanos SA. It seemed a pretty decent cigar this one, possibly as it was kindly donated by a UKCF bod during an exchange last year. Anyway, the review:

    "Last year Habanos SA released the RyJ Wide Churchill. They were, seemingly jumping on two band-wagons at once: the jaw-breaker trend from the States (unfortunately still going strong) and the RyJ ‘Churchill’ brand… The original RyJ Churchill is regarded in almost all circles as a true classic in the Cuban line-up, a fine example of the vitola, and the favourite of Sir Winston Churchill himself. Indeed, it was Pepin Fernandez Rodriguez, the then owner of the RyJ marque, who originally named the vitola after Britain’s war-time leader. What, then, does the Wide Churchill have to do with the Churchill, or indeed Churchill… (You can stop thinking of nodding dogs now!) As far as anyone can work out, not much at all. The Short Churchill is at least roughly the same RG as the Churchill, and is indeed somewhat shorter than the majestic smoke. The Wide Churchill is not, however, a wider version of the Churchill… So what on earth is it called such for? Marketing, as far as anyone can tell. Perhaps they should have called it the ‘Wide Short Churchill’, just to be safe…"

    ryj-wide-churchill-2.jpg

    "Overall Impression /35
    I still don’t like the ring gauge of this cigar… It’s too big: being both uncomfortable and rather gaudy. Despite this, I will say that the Wide Churchill is developing into a very decent smoke of light-to-medium strength and mild-to-medium flavours. There are many things I would pick over it in terms of complexity and intensity of flavours; but if you want something a little different and a bit more relaxed then this is definitely a cigar to consider. The development from start to finish was achieved nicely with flavours which work together. Whilst the construction was not fantastic, and it’s not a cigar to put down for more than a couple of minutes, the draw was acceptable (if a little too easy) and the smoke was fairly aromatic. Give it a go – it’s a fairly good RyJ, but it doesn’t deserve to wear the Churchill name. 32"

    The rest of the review, along with several pictures, can be found on my blog: http://cigarmonologues.wordpress.com...ide-churchill/
    My cigar review blog: The Cigar Monologues (Twitter / Facebook)
    My Company:
    Siparium Sporting

  • #2
    Nice review. I know it's terrible but i can honestly say that the only RyJ i smoke these days is the standard Churchill.

    Comment


    • #3
      Another under-filled wide-Churchill. I am convinced these are built down to a budget (although they are not cheap). Sometimes they are properly rolled and (listening to other experiences) can be a very good stick.

      Sounds like you had the same experience that we had here, not enough tobacco.
      Originally posted by Simon Bolivar
      Little medical correction there Steve, you will surely die...but not from smoking these

      Originally posted by Ryan
      I think that's for lighting electronic cigarettes

      Comment


      • #4
        I personally found the wide to be a little to loose a draw and lacking in punch, but certainly a complex profile. Just not my cup of tea.

        Am dying to try a full-sized Churchill though.

        Comment


        • #5
          I had my first WC this afternoon. I was wary of the loose draw comments but thought WTF....give it a go. Thoroughly enjoyed it. Perfect draw and a perfect flavour profile for a lighter afternoon smoke. Might just have gotten lucky?! I've another out of the same box so hope it smokes as well


          Tapatalked

          Comment


          • #6
            It seems when they are good they are a fine smoke but too many are underfilled.
            Originally posted by Simon Bolivar
            Little medical correction there Steve, you will surely die...but not from smoking these

            Originally posted by Ryan
            I think that's for lighting electronic cigarettes

            Comment


            • #7
              It does seem to be the impression that I got when I was doing some Wide Churchill research - there seems to be quite a bit of inconistency when it comes to how well filled they are. I'd probably say that mine was only just underfilled - not enough to make too much of a difference. Then again, I do like a bit of resistance, so loose draws (even if only slightly so) are one of the first things I will notice about a cigar.

              Glad you enjoyed though Steve - it was certainly a cigar that I felt would just hit the spot if you chose your moment well (and the sunny French Riviera is a pretty good place for this one I think!)
              My cigar review blog: The Cigar Monologues (Twitter / Facebook)
              My Company:
              Siparium Sporting

              Comment

              Working...
              X