I have Monte #2s from two different reputable sources and both types have overlap on the band just like yours Dave. In fact, my Especial #1s also have overlap as does the #4.
The fact that it's cello wrapped doesn't automatically mean it's fake as some retailers pack their singles in cello to protect them in transit. If it's a box of 25 or 10 you've got then deffo fake.
The biggest give-away is the slim ring gauge. From the way the cigar is bunched in the pic of the foot, to the pic of the head....all looks good. Was it a standard ring gauge you passed the cigar through or was it a tape-measure or something?
The fact that it's cello wrapped doesn't automatically mean it's fake as some retailers pack their singles in cello to protect them in transit. If it's a box of 25 or 10 you've got then deffo fake.
The biggest give-away is the slim ring gauge. From the way the cigar is bunched in the pic of the foot, to the pic of the head....all looks good. Was it a standard ring gauge you passed the cigar through or was it a tape-measure or something?




stevielad on this one - cello is not a automatic disclaimer (stevielad taught me that one), but neither is the ring size.
someone who purchased a box of puros (Bolivar RCs) from a La Casa de Habanas in Mexico a few years ago that varied quite widely in terms of the ring size. According to my
proprietor of the LCdH offered to exchange them due to the inconsistency and added that they should have been rejected at the factory. In otherwords, they were authentic puros but were not constructed to the strict standards for Habanas.
! (box date 2002). I had the pleasure to try one and was convinced of the benefits of aging fine Habana puros!
CJ, I will stick my neck out,but unlike senor

I'm TJ, TJCoro Damn It! And I know a fine puro when I smoke it.
don TJ and the
Coros
BJ reminded me of that one.




Comment