The exitement never diminishes

[Sligub]

They'll find their way...... But all i know is that they have half you (and our) union jack. Imagine him flying without any blue.
Then imagine Australia, New Zealand, Falkland Is., Fiji, etc flying their flag with the weird union jack on it.
What if they incorporate the Isle of Mann's logo....... hmmmmm

Well as the Union jack was first used when the James the VI became King of England in 1603 (flag first used in 1606) well before the Union of state in 1707. If the state dissolves(please No) then the Flag would stay the same as the royal union would continue.

[Deano]

The Union Flag please Not the Union Jack!

And the last I heard, the Queen would still be head of state for them. Lots of things to consider.

Interesting stuff though Siglub

[Sligub]

one of those weird points but the Union Flag is not legally the flag of the united kingdom but a royal standard, the only time its been refereed to is a question in 1908 when it was refereed to as the Union jack and in the 2000's when a private members bill was brought forward also referencing the Union jack. So even though its widely said that the Union jack is only on a ship its wrong and is the union jack wherever it's flown.

"That, however, as we now know, is not the case. It was formally announced that the Royal Standard is the personal flag of the Sovereign, and cannot properly be flown without His Majesty's permission, which is only granted when either the King or Queen is present. But, of course, a very different state of things applies to the Union Jack. I think it may fairly be stated, in reply to the noble Earl, that the Union Jack should be regarded as the National flag, and it undoubtedly may be flown on land by all His Majesty's subjects."

statement by his majestys goverment 1908