escort ordu kıbrıs escort escort izmit escort bodrum escort rize escort konya escort kırklareli escort van halkalı escort escort erzurum escort sivas escort samsun escort tokat altinrehbereskisehir.com konyachad.com sakaryaehliyet.com tiktaktrabzon.com escortlarkibris.net canakkalesondaj.com kayseriyelek.com buderuskonya.com Plume vs mold - from facebook - UK Cigar Forums

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Plume vs mold - from facebook

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Shaun
    replied
    Originally posted by JohnL View Post
    Bloom is different from plume. Bloom is a Uk term from H&F used to describe mould. I could look up the exact wording but it was something along the lines of white patches are harmless bloom which can be wiped right off and just show your cigars are alive or something similar. I think there is a reason they chose to invent this term of bloom rather than use the established term of plume. Plume is believed to be the crystallization of oils on the wrapper, but what it actually is has never been proven. Mould with all due respect is what you have on a lot of your cigars. It would not cost more than 100 pounds for you to disprove this. You could bring one of your infected cigars to a Lab and they they would culture it and tell what is growing on it. I actually chucked a bloomed cigar in the bin this morning as had blossomed on the foot
    Interesting first post there....

    I have to agree with you on this being mold. While I appreciate what Mitchell is saying, I have yet to find anyone who agrees with him on this being a 'bloom' or 'plume'.

    Leave a comment:


  • JohnL
    replied
    Originally posted by smokeymo View Post
    Its bloom ( or plume) on the BBF's. I have discussed the subject on and off with Simon Chase for the last quarter of a century. I'm quite confident I can tell the difference.

    If any of you chaps would like to arrange for a group to come to our office I am very happy to show you various different examples ( and have a tasting session in the sampling room of some cigars from our vast range)

    Best

    Mitchell
    Bloom is different from plume. Bloom is a Uk term from H&F used to describe mould. I could look up the exact wording but it was something along the lines of white patches are harmless bloom which can be wiped right off and just show your cigars are alive or something similar. I think there is a reason they chose to invent this term of bloom rather than use the established term of plume. Plume is believed to be the crystallization of oils on the wrapper, but what it actually is has never been proven. Mould with all due respect is what you have on a lot of your cigars. It would not cost more than 100 pounds for you to disprove this. You could bring one of your infected cigars to a Lab and they they would culture it and tell what is growing on it. I actually chucked a bloomed cigar in the bin this morning as had blossomed on the foot

    Leave a comment:


  • Emaresee
    replied
    Anyone want to run point on this outing? If not i am happy to do so....?

    Leave a comment:


  • smokeymo
    replied
    Sure Shepsea,good idea and I dare say we can work something out. Why not. Contact by email please sales@cgarsltd.co.uk

    Cheers

    Mitchell

    Leave a comment:


  • sheppsea
    replied
    Plume vs mold - from facebook

    Originally posted by smokeymo View Post
    Its bloom ( or plume) on the BBF's. I have discussed the subject on and off with Simon Chase for the last quarter of a century. I'm quite confident I can tell the difference.

    If any of you chaps would like to arrange for a group to come to our office I am very happy to show you various different examples ( and have a tasting session in the sampling room of some cigars from our vast range)

    Best

    Mitchell
    Bravo Mitchell for weighing in and defending your products, its always good to see companies engaging with their customers

    I do wonder though, whether the discussion would be better served if these cigars with plume were made available for [MENTION=13402510]ValeTudoGuy[/MENTION]'s efforts to get a scientific answer to what plume is rather than invite members to view them?

    Obviously they are not to be smoked and I'm sure could easily be returned

    Leave a comment:


  • Emaresee
    replied
    Originally posted by smokeymo View Post
    Its bloom ( or plume) on the BBF's. I have discussed the subject on and off with Simon Chase for the last quarter of a century. I'm quite confident I can tell the difference.

    If any of you chaps would like to arrange for a group to come to our office I am very happy to show you various different examples ( and have a tasting session in the sampling room of some cigars from our vast range)

    Best

    Mitchell
    Bravo that man. Evidence and a unified view is invariably helpful. I'm in. No doubt pick up a stick and a dram or two also!

    Sent from my LG-K350 using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • the pondering moose
    replied
    Most gentlemanly, and thank you Mitchell. Even if I was not in a position to join any such a viewing/exposition/sampling (largely on geographical grounds, being on the south coast), in potentia, it may put to bed some "cigar anxiety". That would be a very good thing.
    Last edited by the pondering moose; 01-11-2016, 03:43 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Horsebox
    replied
    That's a smashing offer [MENTION=667]smokeymo[/MENTION]


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • smokeymo
    replied
    Its bloom ( or plume) on the BBF's. I have discussed the subject on and off with Simon Chase for the last quarter of a century. I'm quite confident I can tell the difference.

    If any of you chaps would like to arrange for a group to come to our office I am very happy to show you various different examples ( and have a tasting session in the sampling room of some cigars from our vast range)

    Best

    Mitchell

    Leave a comment:


  • ValeTudoGuy
    replied
    For clarity, I am yet to receive a reply from Oxford. I also contacted Lancaster but they made it hard work even figuring out who to correspond with so I didn't follow up with them.

    Leave a comment:


  • ValeTudoGuy
    replied
    Update: After Cambridge directed me to Kew I decided to make another contact, this time at Leeds.

    I have received a reply from the Principal clinical scientist of their Mycology Reference Centre, he also suggests that we are almost certainly dealing with fungal growth and has specifically highlighted "Aspergillus, Fusarium, Alternaria and Peronospora tabacina" as possibilities. He also directed me to Kew Fungarium.

    He was not made aware of my contact with Cambridge in any way, but was provided with idential information and pictures.

    Again, not waterproof evidence... But to me this is stacking evidence pretty quickly in a certain direction.

    Leave a comment:


  • sheppsea
    replied
    Plume vs mold - from facebook

    Wow, Marc is actually making this debate interesting

    Personally I am sceptical on whether plume even exists, but to have a scientific answer either way would be fantastic

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Bolivar
    replied
    Good work so far on the research Marc; however C.A.'s have been brushing off the odd spot of white fluffy stuff since Columbus's day & not many have been reported with lung infections. I'll continue to brush off, using a hog hair art brush, done away from my humi's so the spores don't end up back in there & smoke those sticks first. The exception being if the mould is on the foot & then I always doubted the burning stick would be sufficient to kill the spores (very tough little buggers spores) & then I'd clip an inch off. If it was mould that wouldn't brush off, return or if too late after purchase- cut off offending section; if evenly distributed ditch.

    I think the main point to remember is plume if you should ever see it is fine (another debate if it's a sign a a great cigar) but mould in any shape or colour is bad & if not dealt with & humidity corrected as far as possible, it will spread & you could lose a box of a drawer full of smokes. Generally the horror pictures will be from collections that haven't been checked & tended, I wasn't going to publish these photos originally but just to demonstrate how it can happen quickly, these two Punch were foine 4-6wks before I found them in this state. So the weather & humidity were just fine for the mould to suddenly take hold on these 1960's Punch PC's. They were the only two cigars in the drawer to have a single spot of mould on them but no doubt it would have spread if not brushed off. I smoked them that week with my friend Zowie (I did inform him of the situation) & they were wonderful vintage smokes & I would have wept to have thrown them away.
    Nothing was noted on the feet & no signs since of respiratory or lung infection.

    Of course everyone has to make their own decisions but regular attention is the key. Once your collection gets over a 50-60 boxes this takes a little more time than a couple of desktops but just think how much money is tied up in those delicate leaves & that should be enough incentive to keep at it. Also good time to check for weevil holes or other signs of infestation. You can imagine that suppliers with thousands of boxes can't possible check them all & that's how you will occasionally get a problem from them. I just bought a couple of packs of cigars at Brussels Duty Free; the Cohiba 's were fine but the Monte No3's had a bit of mould on. I checked these at my destination, brushed them off & they are doing fine.
    The last photo shows the Punch back in the drawer after cleaning, not one of the other Punch had a spot on them.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • the pondering moose
    replied
    Aflatoxin... well that has fame preceding it. And good to know that "plume" is not destroyed by temperature maxima/minima, normally experienced by cigars.

    I shall be proceeding with any such sticks cautiously, under advisement, or until more evidence surfaces.

    Leave a comment:


  • Emaresee
    replied
    Who ever said smoking has no good health side effects.... ??!! this thread has produced any number!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X