escort ordu kıbrıs escort escort izmit escort bodrum escort rize escort konya escort kırklareli escort van halkalı escort escort erzurum escort sivas escort samsun escort tokat altinrehbereskisehir.com konyachad.com sakaryaehliyet.com tiktaktrabzon.com escortlarkibris.net canakkalesondaj.com kayseriyelek.com buderuskonya.com Plume vs mold - from facebook - UK Cigar Forums

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Plume vs mold - from facebook

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Deano
    replied
    Yeah no big surprises for me, it was always going to be a mold of some sort, I just wondered if it was specific to tobacco/cigars and less harmless.
    Fundamentally I would think untreated leaf from a tree is always likely to get mold, I'm surprised we don't get more!
    If it ain't on the end of the stick, I tend to wipe it and smoke

    Leave a comment:


  • ha_banos
    replied
    Ok this is way too geeky for me:


    In case that's broken https://goo.gl/dfJg4a

    I just try to keep the conditions right. Check often. Sniff often. And hope!

    Leave a comment:


  • Simon Bolivar
    replied
    I don't believe fluffy, filimentous type groths are plume, that's mould, as most of us supsected over th eyrs & these tests have backed up. However I am with Tommy, in that I am sure I have seen crystal like sheen on rare occasions. Have we any chemist types here who can think of some oils that do indeed crystalise under certian conditions, that might be found in a tobacco leaf?

    Leave a comment:


  • gojira
    replied
    Send it to me instead

    Leave a comment:


  • Budgie Smuggler
    replied
    I don't believe in plume. My theory is that the fine crystal dusting is either a form of mould or over-application of gum when applying the wrapper.

    Leave a comment:


  • tommy
    replied
    What do you guys make of this. It's a very light dusting but it's something I've only seen twice. Until I read the FoH results on aspergillosis I would have sworn that this is plume. What I didn't know is that mould doesn't always look like fluffy growths. The aspergillosis pics in the article have made me think twice.

    One thing that is holding me to belief in plume is that this cigar was part of a bundle of 50 that were taken from Cuba in 2010 and stored at 65 since then. How does one cigar get mould while the rest have none. I guess it could happen in its short life in Cuba but one cigar in a bundle of 50 seems unlikely. On the other hand one cigar getting plume makes sense to me. If it's a physical show of the oils as they crystallise on the surface and is very rare that would explain this being the only one in the bundle.
    Honestly I don't know, if you could see and smell the cigar in person it would be easier to believe. It has absolutely no musty smell and the stuff is quite dry and sandy to touch. I've offered it to rob, if he wants to test it I'm game.

    Leave a comment:


  • JohnL
    replied
    Maybe site sponsor could send a couple of his in

    Leave a comment:


  • sheppsea
    replied
    Originally posted by SHAMZ84 View Post
    Have they updated the article from last month?
    Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk
    Nope, they are looking for new 'plume' to test

    Originally posted by canistreli View Post
    Thank you for sharing, this was a really interesting read.
    Not conclusive by any means as the sample is so small but the sample does indicate what I have suspected all along

    Leave a comment:


  • canistreli
    replied
    Thank you for sharing, this was a really interesting read.

    Leave a comment:


  • SHAMZ84
    replied
    Have they updated the article from last month?

    Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • sheppsea
    replied
    They have tested 10 samples over at FoH and the early indications is that the existence of plume is bullshit

    The idea behind the mould study was to shed some light into the world of mould and plume. Earlier in the year we asked for examples of both from members and then selected 10 representative cigars for testing. Testing was undertaken by the team at Australia Biotech Laboratories. In the event that ...


    It was a very small sample so not conclusive, but I suspect further testing will prove the same. For anyone that does have a cigar that proves to be plume, they are offering a reward to send it to them:

    We could use members help to spread the word. I will put up a store credit of $250 USD $350 AUD for any member who provides a cigar for testing that proves to be of crystalline substance and not mould. If you believe you have that cigar (or knows someone who has), take a photo or two and email th...

    Leave a comment:


  • Horsebox
    replied
    Originally posted by Shaun View Post
    Laughable
    It's written like it's all based in fact. I wonder if they'll update that particular page?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • SHAMZ84
    replied
    well that puts that argument to bed.

    Leave a comment:


  • Shaun
    replied
    Laughable

    Leave a comment:


  • JoeyGunz
    replied

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X