The Whisky / Whiskey thread

[SHAMZ84]

Yeah, I know what you mean Banos. A lot of the whiskies are going up and up in price now. More and more I'm looking at the independent bottlers for my drams going forward.

Totally agree.

Sent from my GM1913 using Tapatalk

[mcdee]

Same I tried it at AJs a while back. Very nice. But I'm too tight to spend the money it's demanding now.

Yeah, I know what you mean Banos. A lot of the whiskies are going up and up in price now. More and more I'm looking at the independent bottlers for my drams going forward.

[ha_banos]

The one I'm holding is the original version which was discontinued early 2000s I think. I have had a few bottles of the current Cigar Malt Reserve and it's a very nice dram.

Same I tried it at AJs a while back. Very nice. But I'm too tight to spend the money it's demanding now.

[mcdee]

Looks really good. Let us know how you like it. I’ve had my eye on a bottle for some time but a bit overweight on Dalmore at the moment so waiting to finish off what I have before adding more


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The one I'm holding is the original version which was discontinued early 2000s I think. I have had a few bottles of the current Cigar Malt Reserve and it's a very nice dram.

[ShaazK]

Got this recently.

Looks really good. Let us know how you like it. I’ve had my eye on a bottle for some time but a bit overweight on Dalmore at the moment so waiting to finish off what I have before adding more


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[mcdee]

Got this recently.

[mcdee]

Highly recommend the Murray McDavid Cask Craft range to anyone looking for excellent value, quality whiskies. Only £32 each.

[ha_banos]

Sorry cask strength

Sent from my GM1913 using Tapatalk

60% no less!

[SHAMZ84]

No. Surely they would say if it was single cask. It's not in the blurb. They also don't say what the age is. Legally all risky must be at least 3 years old IIRC. I'd guess it is mixed cask single malt, older and not so old. But this doesn't take anything away from it. Certainly worth a try.

Sorry cask strength

Sent from my GM1913 using Tapatalk

[ha_banos]

No the 105 is a single cask iirc

Sent from my GM1913 using Tapatalk

No. Surely they would say if it was single cask. It's not in the blurb. They also don't say what the age is. Legally all risky must be at least 3 years old IIRC. I'd guess it is mixed cask single malt, older and not so old. But this doesn't take anything away from it. Certainly worth a try.

[SHAMZ84]

I assume you meant 15 year? If not apologies.

I found the 15 year much nicer than the 12 but a lot more expensive.

No the 105 is a single cask iirc

Sent from my GM1913 using Tapatalk

[trying]

There's a 105 too. Look at the colour difference between the 12 and 15. Might have to come back to the 15. But the 105 is more lively.

PXL_20230420_172623348.jpg

Tried those on a Robert Graham virtual event a couple of years back, seem to remember the 105 was pretty punchy

[ha_banos]

I assume you meant 15 year? If not apologies.

I found the 15 year much nicer than the 12 but a lot more expensive.

There's a 105 too. Look at the colour difference between the 12 and 15. Might have to come back to the 15. But the 105 is more lively.

PXL_20230420_172623348.jpg

[Kickback]

Try the 105...it's lovely.

Sent from my GM1913 using Tapatalk

I assume you meant 15 year? If not apologies.

I found the 15 year much nicer than the 12 but a lot more expensive.

[ha_banos]

18.50£ today not tried it. Nice enough. Made me cough. Coke at the ready...

PXL_20230504_205104386.jpg